Techno-economic analysis

Does the physics pay for itself?

A transparent, literature-anchored model comparing a continuous sonochemical (acoustic + microwave) beneficiation stage bolted onto an existing flowsheet against a conventional acid-digestion / solvent-extraction baseline. Every figure is an illustrative, literature-derived placeholder, a framework to reason with, not a commercial quote.

How to read this model

This is a micro-level, marginal analysis. It estimates the economics of adding one continuous sonochemical beneficiation stage to an existing conventional flowsheet at a single illustrative plant: 100 t/day throughput, 0.5% REE grade, $90/kg NdPr. Every figure is a literature-derived placeholder — a framework to reason with, not a commercial quote.

To claim these numbers apply to every mine, grade, or price environment would obviously be false. Deposit chemistry, scale, energy cost, labour regimes, and existing infrastructure all shift the economics. What this model is useful for is showing the directional leverage of recovery uplift in a continuous intensification stage, and how sensitive that leverage is to price and recovery assumptions.

At a macro scale, the picture is different — and much larger. The global rare-earth industry loses a significant share of in-situ REE value to recovery shortfalls and reagent intensity across thousands of tonnes per day. If continuous intensification can recover even a few additional percentage points across a meaningful share of that throughput, the aggregate annual value creation runs into the billions. This model is one small, rigorously bounded step toward understanding that larger opportunity.

Net annual benefit

$1.66M

Revenue uplift + environmental proxy − incremental cost.

Simple payback

~0.45 yr

Equipment capex / net annual benefit.

Benefit–cost ratio

5.2×

Gross benefit / incremental annual cost.

Incremental cost

$0.39M/yr

Amortisation + labour + electricity only.

The incremental cost covers only the new acoustic / microwave equipment (amortisation, labour, electricity) added to an existing process. Revenue uplift comes from a conservative +12 pp recovery gain. This is a marginal add-on case, not a full greenfield plant TEA.

Baseline vs. proposed stage

MetricConventionalProposedDelta
REE recovery rate60%72%+12 pp
REE recovered99,000 kg/yr118,800 kg/yr+19,800 kg/yr
Revenue$8.91M/yr$10.69M/yr+$1.78M/yr

Sensitivity

Net annual benefit ($/yr) across recovery uplift (rows) and REE price (columns). The base case, +12 pp uplift at $90/kg, is highlighted. Below zero, the added stage does not pay for its own electricity, labour and amortisation.

Uplift \ Price$53/kg$90/kg$110/kg$140/kg
0 pp-$393k-$393k-$393k-$393k
+6 pp$267k$633k$831k$1.13M
+12 pp$926k$1.66M$2.05M$2.65M
+18 pp$1.59M$2.68M$3.28M$4.17M
+24 pp$2.24M$3.71M$4.50M$5.69M

Key assumptions

Ore throughput

100 t/day

Illustrative mid-scale staged line, adjustable.

Operating days / year

330

Typical industrial uptime.

REE grade in feed

0.5%

Illustrative secondary / tailings-grade feedstock (ion-adsorption clay / mine-waste range).

REE price (NdPr basis)

$90 / kg

SMM benchmark, 1 Jun 2026. 2026 range $53–$140/kg; DoD-backed floor $110/kg.

Conventional recovery

60%

Illustrative acid-digestion / SX recovery benchmark.

Recovery uplift

+12 pp

Conservative extrapolation from leach-rate / yield gains in the literature.

Proposed recovery

72%

Conventional recovery + uplift.

Conventional cash OPEX

$30 / kg

Midpoint of $20–50/kg reported for advanced-stage REE projects.

Added acoustic + microwave capacity

50 kW

Illustrative for a 100 t/day staged line.

Equipment capex (one-time)

$750,000

From public ultrasonic / inline-homogeniser pricing.

Sources

Process / cost data

Brown et al., Sustainable Chemistry, 2025, 6(4):33, doi.org/10.3390/suschem6040033

REE price ($90.32/kg NdPr, 1 Jun 2026)

Shanghai Metals Market (SMM) benchmark; metal.com

DoD-backed price floor ($110/kg)

MP Materials / US DoD contract reporting, 2026

Industrial electricity ($0.085/kWh)

US EIA, 2026 industrial-sector price projection

Conventional REE OPEX ($20–50/kg)

Techno-economic analyses of advanced-stage REE projects, 2024–2026

Ultrasonic equipment capex ($10k–60k/kW)

Hielscher UIP2000hdT; GEA DiSonic inline homogeniser, public pricing, 2026

Tailings / NORM remediation ($0.12–$68/t)

Uranium mill tailings remediation programs incl. US UMTRA Title I

Read the TEA methodology explainer